Today is
Singapore’s National Day. It’s day where we celebrate 56-years of Independence
or the day that we got ourselves kicked out of the Malaysian Federation. Our celebration
is unique. Unlike other nations, like say, the USA or India, our “Independence
Day” is not a celebration of Independence but a celebration of survival. We
didn’t fight for our Independence. The rallying cry from our first leaders was “Merdeka
Malaysia” rather than “Majullah Singapura,” and the person who gave us Independence
was actually Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia’s first Prime Minister, who booted us
out of the Malaysian Federation.
Singapore, as
is often said in the international press, a wonderful example of how to create everything
from nothing. The strategy for doing so was simple. We became a bastion of
stability in a turbulent nation and in age where everyone was rejecting “investment”
from former colonisers, we welcomed them.
One of the things
that made us so attractive to the community of investors was the fact that we
were officially governed by laws and we made it clear that unlike other places,
we would not be a place that was governed by ethnic or religious concerns. We
have found through our collective experience that approaching things “regardless
of race or religion,” has been good for our prosperity.
Yet, despite
years of enjoying a system of “regardless of race or religion,” there were a
few events prior to National Day, which gave a sense that all was not that well
with our state of religious harmony. There was, for example, the incident of a
racist lecturer who accosted an interracial couple and started haranguing them
in public for being – “interracial.” What was disturbing about this incident
was the fact that he actually received sympathy in some quarters for losing his
job and one commentator on TRemeritus actually questioned how I would feel if
all the Chinese girls went for Indian men (the answer being my d*** is not
racist and I would have looked for a cute Indian chick).
This experience
isn’t totally unique to me. Singapore’s Magically Unconflicted Writer and
Enforcer of Laws, Mr. K. Shanmugam was asked by at forum organised by Lianhe
Zaobao, our Chinese language daily; “Chinese Singaporeans, the largest group in
Singapore, are now asked to be sensitive to the minority. But shouldn't the
largest group have the right to decide on Singapore's direction, such as
education, language to be used, like other countries?”
What makes this
question particularly interesting is the fact that it indicates a sense of vulnerability.
As the largest ethnic group in Singapore, the Chinese inevitably have the
largest influence in deciding the direction of Singapore’s culture.
Take the use of
language. Malay is Singapore’s national language. However, for my generation
(Gen X), we only use the language for singing the national anthem and army
drill commands. Then, there’s English,
which is the official working language of the country. We all grew up learning
and using English is everyday life.
That leaves
Mandarin and Tamil (the majority of Singapore-born Indians being descended from
people from Tamil Nadu). Of the two, Mandarin is considerably more significant
in as much as the Chinese are the larger group. However, if you consider the
fact that Mandarin is not actually the mother tongue of Singaporeans of Chinese
descent (Lee Kuan Yew had an obsession with eradicating Chinese dialects), you’ll
find things even more interesting.
Singapore is
filled with Tamils who may not necessarily be able to speak Tamil but will
speak several Chinese dialects fluently. I think of the conversations I used to
have with one of my former father-in-law’s businesses associates. The man spoke
better Mandarin than me and if you shut your eyes when speaking to him, you
wouldn’t realise he wasn’t Chinese. On the reverse, you’re not going to find a
Chinese who speaks Tamil, with the exception of a few curse words (which my
Tamil friends from India are quick to assure me are words they would never use
because it’s so crass)
Why is that?
The answer is simple. The Chinese are in the majority and so there’s no need to
learn Tamil. By contrast, the Tamils living in Singapore and to an extent in
Malaysia learn Chinese dialects or the language of the streets.
An ethnic majority
has an automatic advantage by being the majority. Minorities by default need to
adapt to the majority. The situation is not much different elsewhere. Just as
Tamils learn Chinese dialects in Singapore, Mexican migrants in the USA are
quick to learn English for the simple reason that English is the language of
the majority.
Chinese in
Singapore are not about to lose their status as the dominant group just as White
people in America are not about to be displaced in the immediate future. What
is clear though is that the minority populations in both Singapore and USA are
growing.
Is this a bad
thing? I don’t think so, or at least I
don’t think it should be. Cultures are constantly evolving and I believe that
everyone takes a bit of everyone else’s culture and it evolves into something different
and unique. If you want the Chinese to be the majority in perpetuity, there is
the option of greater migration of people from Mainland China. However, that
creates another problem – the differences between Singaporean Chinese and
Mainland Chinese are actually greater than between Singaporeans of different
races.
As a majority,
we need not fear the loss of any advantages in life. We merely need to
understand that our fellow citizens of different races and religions also have
certain needs and values too and they are deserving of respect as much as we
are. “Dark jokes” towards darker skinned people for example, are not funny when
repeated often enough, especially when you’re on the receiving end. Minorities
by default are the ones adapting and what they’re asking from the majority is
merely a bit of sensitivity, which we, as the group in power should provide as
a sign of strength.
2 comments
Thanks Tang. This line 'However, that creates another problem – the differences between Singaporean Chinese and Mainland Chinese are actually greater than between Singaporeans of different races' is incredibly true and it is something I have had my Singapore Chinese friends mention repeatedly.
You are too truthful for even the so called alternative press in singapore! Otherwise they will be fighting to see who gets first permission to use yr articles. Thank you once again spelling out succinctly what mostly everyone else knows to be truth, but darent say it. This policy of bringing in mainland Chinese just to retain 70% ratio is going to come and bite us back in the bum in the long term I reckon.
Post a Comment