One of my fans on TRemeritus decided that I was fanning the flame of racial politics and called upon the government to keep and eye on me so that if there was another riot in Little India, I would be held accountable:
So, in light of this, I am morally bound to continue being a
shit stirrer, safe in the comfort that the government actually does keep an eye
on trouble makers. This was made very clear by the news that a 16-year-old boy
had been arrested under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for plotting to carry attacks
on two mosques. The young boy had apparently been influenced by the perpetrator
of the 2019 Christ Church Shooting and had allegedly tried to emulate his “Kiwi
Hero.” The news report can be found at:
As a “shit-stirrer who self-champions the cause of dark-skinned
South Asians,” I’m very happy that the government has made this arrest because
it proves an uncomfortable point – namely the fact that Islam does not have a monopoly
on arseholes and that Muslims are as much victims of terrorist intent and
actions as they are perpetrators.
While this point may seem like an obvious one, it isn’t,
particularly in an age where ugly stereotypes have become fashionable. This
trend of being ugly and proud of it was best summed up by the former occupant
of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, who got the job by promising to ban Muslims from
entering the country and thought it was perfectly acceptable to complain that
the people coming across the Rio Grande to cause social unrest by doing jobs no
one wanted were rapist.
As awful as the message was, it made him votable. People
thought he was “telling it as it is,” and there were certain copycats around
the world. You had the likes of Geert Wilders in the Netherlands and Marie
Le-Penn in France making major strides in elections. Bashing dark skinned
immigrants suddenly stopped being disgustingly racist but refreshingly honest.
While the most prominent terrorist in recent years have been Muslim (think of Osama Bin Ladin and Abu Bakar Bahdadi), there have been plenty of other communities that have indulged in what can only be described as “terrorist” activities. In the USA, we had the rise of White Nationalist like Neo Nazis, Proud Boys and those who loved the Confederate. In India, you had the rise of Hindu Nationalist and so on. I think of the Young Muslim Politician from Pasir Ris GRC, who tried to convince me that Trump had America safe. Well, yes, he was correct, there were no Islamist terrorist attacks but then there was Charlottesville and the now infamous storming of the US Congress of 6 January 2021. The President who was so good at condemning Islamist violence was rather reluctant to condemn violence when it was carried out by anyone who was a shade lighter than pink.
These guys are only wearing different cloths
This is a shame because everyone noticed that the apparatus
of state was more interested in solving only one type of terrorism whilst
giving a pass to another. So, instead of solving the problem of terrorism, it
was a case of giving fuel to another side.
From these guys
Unfortunately, in “secular” systems of government, a certain
amount of neutrality is required when approaching a problem. Personal
prejudices have to be set aside and subordinated to certain ideals for the
common good. Crimes, whether they are petty or terrorist, need to be dealt with
regardless of race or religion.
Take the example of the United Kingdome. When I went to
school in the UK, it was understood that there was a terrorist group known as
the Irish Republican Army (IRA), which was happily bombing parts of the UK and
finding ways to do as much harm to British military and civil organizations as
they could. They played on Ireland’s historical grievances against the British
and raised money from Americans of Irish decent, which they promptly used to
buy weapons against the British.
As bad as the IRA were, they had a rival known as the Ulster
Defense Association (UDA). While the IRA were fighting to make Northern Ireland
a part of the Republic of Ireland, the UDA were fighting to keep Northern
Ireland part of the UK. While the UDA did to the Catholic Community what the IRA
were doing to the Protestant and British communities, the UDA were for the
longest time not designated a terrorist group while the IRA were.
Spot the Difference between this group and
This Group
It was only in 1996 when the British Government designated
the UDA as a terrorist organization and this suddenly gave the British
government the ability to sit down and negotiate a peace for Northern Ireland.
There could be a lesson here. Honest brokers need to be just
that and governments need to take the lead in being the honest broker amongst
the various communities that make up the nations that they run.
Governments also need to understand that it is now time for
them to promote values. I think of the former Superintendent of the US Air Force
Academy, Lieutenant-General Jay Silveria, who told the class at the Airforce
academy that the only way to beat a horrible idea is with a better idea. In the
age of Covid-19, it’s time for governments around the world to promote better
ideas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mU0RfhvYN8s
No comments
Post a Comment