I am, what you’d call a late entrant in the area of watching
Korean dramas. With the exception of a
few meals at Korean restaurants and enjoying the odd bit of eye candy of Korean
girl groups, I was never into Korean soft culture until the circuit breaker,
when I found myself with sometime and easy access to Netflix.
One of my most recent discoveries was a series called “Whisper,”
which tells the story of an honest judge and policewoman who team up to bring
down a very corrupt but very powerful law firm that has built up its business
in the arms trade. The most interesting character in this drama is the head of
this law firm - main villain. He is the son of a “slave” who built an empire
through brains and hard work. The man is a spider in a web of connections with
those with power. If he wasn’t a character in a Korean drama, he’d probably be on
the cover of Forbes Magazine.
The crux of the entire series is the scene when he teaches his
daughter how to gain the loyalty of person to the extent that the person will
do literally anything for them. His advice is as follows:
- Take Away EVERYTHING they have;
- Help them climb up when they reach rock bottom
If you look at this advice, you’ll realise that the man in a
genius. Who wouldn’t want to be loyal to the people who helped them when they
were down?
Every bit of “feel-good” and “self-help” wisdom tells you
that the people who really care about you, are the ones who are there for you
when you are down and out and are unable to offer yourself, let alone anyone
else anything of any possible value. The human brain is such that once we get
out of the proverbial doldrums, we’re bound to think better and act more favorably
to those who bothered speaking to us when we were down.
The villain in Whisper is correct in his second point. We
are inevitably loyal to those who helped us when we were down. What most of us
tend to don’t do is to question the first piece of advice, especially when it
comes to our “friends” who are in positions of power and influence. I mean, who
on earth would even question the person who was there for us when we were at
our lowest point?
Yet, its an important piece of advice, especially when you
apply it to the current global economic disaster caused by the current
pandemic. Most of us have reached or are reaching low points in our personal
finances. Jobs and other sources of income are hard to come by, yet bills like mortgages
need to be serviced. Nobody has any clue as to how when an economic recovery
will happen and even then, it will be sometime before any of us see a recovery in
our personal finances.
In such situations, we’re bound to accept a helping hand regardless
of where it comes from. If you look at “talking points” and conversations that
people had before the circuit breaker in April, it was on the topic of
government assistance.
Singapore’s government was perhaps one of the more
sophisticated in dealing with this. The government announced in February that was
preparing for an economic slowdown and proceeded to make sure that the public
knew that it was asking the president permission to draw down from the reserves
(which is a “given” in practice as the president is “selected” by the
government). There were also great pains to announce there were an
unprecedented four budgets, which were designed to help us get through the
economic storm.
It was only at the end of June, when the government decided
to call for a snap election and it was only after the election that the
government announced that the economy had been in a double-digit recession. You
have to hand it to the government to timing things well. The first payout came in April, while we were
getting used to life under lockdown. The second was in June, a month before the
election.
In fairness to the Singapore government, it’s not the only
one to try and pull this off. Donald Trump’s biggest political stunt was to try
and get the stimulus cheques sent out to have his signature. Think about it – you
can say what you want about the man prescribing medications he has no business
prescribing and mismanaging things because the feelings that matter are not the
ones that you talk about but the ones you have when you look at that cheque and
then look at your bills.
Politicians know that we’re less critical towards our “benefactors”
in downturns. We’re in no position to start questioning sources of money, when the
need to pay bills remains pressing and money is a scarce commodity. Who in
their right mind is going to question the motives of the guy offering something
that you need most?
The saying that we should always remember the people who
helped us in hard times rings true. However, at the same time, it’s also
important to remember how we got into the hard times and the role that our
benefactors may have had in putting us there.
No comments
Post a Comment