One of the key issues that was used against US
President-Elect, Joe Biden is the fact that he’s old. As at the time of
writing, Mr. Biden is 78-years old and when he’s inaugurated on 20 January
2020, Mr. Biden will be a good nine years older than the previous record holder
for oldest man to take office, Ronald Regan, who was 69 at the time of his inauguration
in 1981. Interestingly enough, Mr. Biden’s opponent, the Donald was not much younger
at 73. The two key records from this particular US election was the fact that it
involved the greatest number of votes cast and the first time that two septuagenarians
went against each other.
This fact shouldn’t escape people, especially in a day and
age where people in advanced economies face unprecedented ageism. Singapore is
no exception. Despite being healthier and fitter than I was a decade ago, I’ve
effectively accepted that at the age of 46, I will never have a “corporate
career,” and the fact that people still consider me for some white-collar work
(OK, admittedly I am allergic to files and offices) is something of a miracle. I
am, as they say, a lucky one. For people who have had good careers and suddenly
find themselves thrown out of work, the situation is even worse. It’s a
terrible experience to be an established character one day and less than nobody
with bills to pay the next.
We have to face an uncomfortable fact – we’re all getting
old and while getting old is an inescapable fact, the idea of a comfortable old
age of playing golf and sipping pina coladas by the beach is an increasingly unattainable
fantasy. Let’s face it – aging folk need to keep going. From a social demographic
perspective, Covid-19 is helping us cull old folks but not making it easier to
grow old.
Ageism in Singapore is rife enough for government ministers
to come out to state that age should not be a barrier to hiring people. Yet,
age discrimination continues and the only saving grace for Singapore is the
fact it isn’t the only place where ageism happens. Why does it happen? Some of
the reasons for not hiring aging workers are as follows:
https://content.wisestep.com/older-workers/
- 1. May be too set in their way of working
- 2. Might have problems to take instructions
- 3. Not be able to use modern technology well
- 4. Used to do things manually
- 5. Expect respect from the manager
- 6. Will be nearer to the age of retirement
- 7. Will be serving lesser tenure in the company
- 8. May not be open to any kind of criticism
- 9. Might be tough to adapt themselves to new setting
It helps that we live in age of constant technological change
that has “disrupted” just about every industry around. The argument goes – old people
can’t keep up with the constant technological change – they simply don’t have
the energy to keep up with the constant and rapid pace of change.
Being old is simply not cool. In business, we always read
about “Young Start-up Founders” or kids with a bright idea who avoided the
conventional path and made billions. That stuff is cool. Nobody wants to know
about aged executives or old boys trying to start a noodle shop to make ends
meet. Being aged is the opposite of hip.
Hopefully the battling grandpas will help settle some of the
issues on age old discrimination. If you can consider letting two septuagenarians
run for the most complex job on the planet, surely you can allow someone over
the age of 50 the right to run a convenience shop? The very presence of the
grandpas should help put some of the myths of hiring old people to rest.
Take the key issue of energy. The main argument against
hiring old people is that they lack energy for today’s fast paced work place. To
make matters worse, not only do old people not have the energy to get things done,
they’re more likely to get sick and die. There is as they say, a good reason
why your insurance premiums get higher as you get older. So, from a business
perspective, why hire someone who will have less energy to do the things that
you need to get done and will costs more.
Having said all that, people should look at Mr. Bidden as a
positive example of why you should not make such examples about old people. At
the age of 78, Mr. Bidden is physically active. The man runs without any
assistance and goes cycling
Then there was the example of George HW Bush who took up
parachuting at the age of 90. As was said at his funeral, he was someone who
knew how to die young as late as possible. While much is said about how the young
people are shaking up things, the truth is that it’s the baby boomers who are the
real driving force of things. Look at it this way, there was a generational
change between the “silent generation” and the “baby boomers,” when Bill Clinton
defeated the first George Bush in 1992. Clinton was succeeded by Bush II, who
was another boomer. There was something of a generational change when Obama
came in but this was quickly reversed with the advent of Donald Trump.
Copyright Business Insider
Then there is the issue of whether the old folks get technology. It’s here, where the Donald sets an example of a grandpa who does get new technologies. While Mr. Trump lacks the physical energy of Mr. Bidden (he struggles to walk down a plank – an obvious result of a diet of junk food), Mr. Trump more than makes up for it in his use of technologies like Twitter. While his predecessor was supposed to the “young” and “hip” President, the first “real social media” President is Donald Trump who ran the country from his infamous Twitter account.
Whatever one’s political inclinations, we should be grateful that this most recent US election was fought by two grandpas, who managed to show the world that age is a number. Contrary to conventional wisdom – grandpas do get it and we should never discount someone just because they’re past a certain age that the text books disqualify them from.
No comments
Post a Comment