The big news today comes from across the causeway where
Malaysia’s once and future Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad submitted
his resignation to the King. The move is being seen as a political ploy by Dr.
Mahathir to break up his pact with his former deputy and nemesis, Mr. Anwar
Ibrahim.
I’m old enough to remember a time when Mr. Anwar was Dr.
Mahathir’s loyal deputy, who was waiting patiently for the old man to retire
and to take the hot seat. Mr. Anwar was in many ways, the ideal Malay
politician, pious enough to appeal to the Kampong folk but at the same time
international enough in his outlook to appeal to the international finance
community. Then the Asian Financial Crisis happened and Mr. Anwar fell out with
the old man, who had him arrested and sent to jail on charges of sodomsing his
driver. Mr. Anwar spent more than two
decades in the wilderness of opposition and then, suddenly, was gifted with an
alliance with Dr. Mahathir, when the later fell out with Mr. Najib.
When the opposition won a surprise election in 2018, it was
assumed that Dr. Mahathir would take the resigns of power until Mr. Anwar had
finished his jail sentence and was ready to take over. In the meantime, Mr.
Anwar’s wife, Dr. Wan Azizah would serve as Deputy Prime Minister.
Now that this seems unlikely, the one question people should
ask is – did one expect anything else? The sayings that come to mind are – “A
leopard never changes its spots,” and “you can’t teach and old dog new tricks,”
come to mind. Mr. Anwar has been proverbially screwed by Dr. Mahathir before
and at 94 (Dr. Mahathir being a very fit and sprightly 90 plus-year old) one
can only expect Dr. Mahathir to act as he’s always done.
I think of today’s news because it reminds me of an old
truism that people act as their nature has made them. I think of David Ogilvy,
the founder of Ogilvy & Mather, who said that the thing we have to focus on
is, “Unchanging man.”
When you look through the prism of “unchanging man” you’ll
come to accept that there is no such thing as a person that you cannot trust.
You can trust everybody to act according to their nature. One merely needs to
read people well and to understand their nature in order to understand how
they’ll act. If you complain “So and so cheated me,” or so and so “broke my
trust,” its probably a reflection of your inability to read their nature rather
than the failings of their character. In an ideal world, everyone would be
trust worthy and brave and wonderful, but this isn’t an ideal world. If you
expect an eunuch like Donald Trump (who has a track record of being a eunuch)
to stand up to the likes of Vladimir Putin (who has a record of being a
killer), you’re kidding yourself. Mr. Trump has been a sniveling coward and to
expect him to be otherwise is not his fault but yours for expecting him to be
what he is clearly not.
I’m reminded of the time I tried to tell Fleshball to behave
in public. Her immediate reaction was to tell me, “I’m like that what!” She was
right. The fool was me. I thought a proud street girl would be somewhat docile
and well behaved in “polite public.” The question is – why did I expect her to
be anything to be other than what she was.
Before you deal with people, get to know them. Understand
the essence of their nature and how they became who they were. Once you do
that, you’ll find that you can implicitly trust them to act as their nature
dictates.
No comments
Post a Comment