Thursday, July 03, 2025

“We Have Standards in the West” – Charlie Kirk


 

If you wanted an area to kick the Singapore government, it would be its common refrain of “The Public is not ready for a Non-Chinese Prime Minister,” during every election. The point is simple. Successive Singapore governments have made the point that Singapore is a “meritocracy.” Our national pledge talks about “regardless of race, language or religion.” We’ve been the proud poster boy of “multiracialism” and “multiculturalism.” Yet, whenever the topic of leadership succession comes about, the same government which talks about “multiracialism” and “meritocracy” will tell you that Singapore is simply not ready for a “non-Chinese” (the majority community) to take charge of things.

One only needs to look at the previous change of power. The star was the then Deputy Prime Minister, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam. He remains a great policy wonk with a precious commodity – international recognition (Mr. Tharman used to serve with the IMF). He’s also got a good common touch that resonates with the ground. Yet, despite what everyone said, Mr. Tharman ruled himself out of the succession race and got himself kicked upstairs to the presidency (In theory the one all of us need to call Sir – but in reality, does what a nice silver tea spoon does.) Instead, the job went to Mr. Lawrence Wong, whom while competent enough in his own right, remains many years Mr. Tharman’s junior in the political sphere (probably the only first time in history where the President was the Prime Minister’s senior in their previous career.)

So, when you look at the claim made by the government that the public is “not ready” for a “non-Chinese” Prime Minister, it does seem to make the government’s claims of Singapore being a “non-racial” “meritocracy” ring a little hollow.

However, does the government have a point when it makes this rather obvious claim on the limits of “diversity.” Given obsession of “looking for best practices around the world,” you could argue that the government has seen something that the rest of us don’t. In this case, it’s the fact that the record of someone not fitting into the mainstream coming into power has been a little sad.

One might argue that this isn’t totally accurate. America elected its “Black” president in Barak Obama and the UK had its first “Asian” Prime Minister in the shape of Rishi Sunak. However, I’ve argued that both Mr. Obama and Mr. Sunak are the exception that proves the rule. Whilst both men have a different complexion from the majority in the countries they led, they are from “elite” backgrounds (Mr. Obama is from Harvard Law School, Mr. Sunak went to Winchester and Oxford) and thus “acceptable.” Then, you have to add in the fact that Mr. Sunak was never elected to the job and whilst Mr. Obama did win two elections, he was replaced by Mr. Donald Trump who basically won on being everything Mr. Obama is not.

Here's the nasty truth – being different scares the living crap out of the majority. People are easily scared and when they’re scared, they find comfort in believing all sorts of silly things that may be said about you.

Prime example – the recent elevation of Mr. Zohran Mamdani to be the candidate of the Democratic Party for Mayor of New York City. Let’s make the point that he’s only become a “candidate” of a political party and not the holder of a political office.

Yet, despite this, Mr. Mamdani has become an instant target of “hatred” from the Republican party and incidentally, his own “Democratic” party. He has been accused on being an “antisemitic” enemy of the state of Israel and the common refrain is that if elected, Mr. Mamdani will enact Sharia law in New York city:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X6jQJmsDCU

 


 

There is no evidence to suggests that Mr. Mamdani has said he would implement Sharia law and the main charges against him for being “antisemitic” come from the fact that he’s mentioned that he would arrest Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu,” should he step foot in New York City, which would be in accordance with International Law (Mr. Netanyahu has been indicted by the International Criminal Court for War Crimes) and interestingly enough, from stating that he would stay in New York city instead of running off to Israel if elected mayor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnlQW8Rh80A

 


 

There is no evidence to suggests that Mr. Mamdani is going to implement anything terribly radical in the area of social demography if elected as Mayor. Yet, and yet, there’s a rush to paint Mr. Mamdani as Osama bin Ladin’s successor for the mere fact of being who is (South Asian Immigrant Muslim):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVtfxnaLVig

 


 


It’s not that Mr. Mamdani is a saint. There are things that potential opponents can attack him for. One of the most obvious areas is in policy details. How, for example, exactly does he plan to pay for what he’s promising. These would be more “solid” ways of attacking him than say making him the cultural enemy of the main stream.

Then, there’s the point that when you focus on attacking him personally, you miss addressing the point as to why he’s “winning.”

Ironically, Mr. Mamdani’s strategy has been to take a leaf from Mr. Trump – focus on key issues affecting people and harping on them. Mr. Trump talked about the price of eggs. Mr. Mamdani is talking about rents in New York.

Again, look at his answer about “foreign trips.” His point is straight – he’s running for “Mayor of New York” and not “secretary of state.” His job is to look after “New York,” and he’ll stay next to the people who voted for him rather than travel to the Middle East. Watch his answers in public forums and he’s very focused on his message.

Mr. Mamdani has scared both sides of the political isle. Yet, he’s understood that there is a segment of the electorate that believes the entire establishment is no longer interested in real issues and he’s tapped into that. Whilst he may not be perfect, he’s shown that whilst many people may not be comfortable with someone who doesn’t look, eat or pray like them, they’re willing to overcome such differences if that person is willing to listen to their needs.

 



No comments

© 2025 BeautifullyIncoherent
Maira Gall