Singapore has just seen its first major industrial action in
26-years. On Monday, 26 November, 2012, 100 bus drivers from the Singapore Mass
Rapid Transport Corporation (SMRT) decided to stop work in protest over their
pay and working conditions. As expected, bus services were affected and the
SMRT was left scrambling to find a way of dealing with the situation.
The great and the good have weighed in on the issue. The
Powers-That-Be have been stunned. Singapore has prided itself in being “strike-free.”
The official stand is, “This is illegal criminal activity and we cannot condone
it – there are proper channels to air your grievances and you cannot take
things into your own hands.” There is of course the other shock in that this ‘strike’
is led by Mainland Chinese – a group the government has led into the country in
the belief that they’d be so grateful to be let into Singapore that they’d be
even more docile than the local population.
What’s particularly interesting is the fact that a great
number of comments in the online and mainstream media have been echoing this
sentiment. One lady has gone as far as to call them “thugs” and accusing them
of trying to hold the nation hostage. It seems that the government has managed
to find itself on the right side of the backlash against its very own policy to
open the flood gates to foreign labour.
Unfortunately, everyone seems to be missing the point here.
The question that should be asked is – “What is it that made 100 Mainland Chinese
strike?” Let’s face it, the Chinese are known as sturdy migrants who are able
to take an enormous amount of rubbish that most other groups won’t take. Today’s
migrants from Mainland China don’t come from the thriving metropolises of
Beijing and Shanghai. A very large portion of them come from rural areas are untouched
by the economic growth driving China. What you give them should be better than
what they’re used to.
It turns out that the group was protesting against the fact
that they were getting a vastly inferior deal to their Malaysian counterparts.
According to the statistics released by SMRT an average Chinese driver was
getting a good $400 a month less than his Malaysian counterpart. When the SMRT
Corporation increased the pay of Malaysian drivers, it didn’t for the ones from
China. A few have argued that the pay differential is not as great as it seems
since the company subsidized the accommodation of the Chinamen by $270 a month
per person. Unfortunately what it didn’t factor into the equation was the fact
that the Chinamen worked vastly longer hours in return for their miniscule pay
rise. Furthermore, the Malaysian drivers were hired as permanent staff, thus
enjoying job security and regular pay increments, which the guys from China did
not get (the guys from China are hired on a two-year contract).
Let’s face it, there is no rational way of looking at the
comparison and realizing that the Chinese guys were getting a raw deal – raw enough
for them to do something about it. Who is at fault? Whatever way you look at
it, the SMRT Corporation has failed in basic communications and labour
relations. Let’s just look at some issues here.
Are Chinese Bus Drivers Inferior to Malaysian Ones?
Some Singapore Chinese Graduate lady wrote on the Today News
paper’s online portal that Chinese should have asked why they were getting paid
less instead of complaining about it. The lady in question went as far as to
suggest that the lower pay was due to inferior language skills of the Chinese
bus drivers
Let’s start with the obvious; this isn’t the only time that
people have complained about the lack of English language skills by people from
China. Most of the complaints have come from the service sector. So given that
complaints about the language skills of PRC nationals is not exactly new, why
did the SMRT hire PRC drivers whose language skills may not have been up to
par? As a business, it is surely in the interest of the company to ensure that
the people it hires can communicate with their customers.
The Second Point is that the key element of driving a bus is
driving skills rather than language skills. Yes, you do need to communicate
basic messages to passengers – ie you got to be able to advise people on
certain routs but other than that your job as a bus driver is to drive well and
safely. Nobody has shown any evidence what so ever that PRC drivers were inferior in this crucial
aspect of the job to their Malaysian and dare I say, Singaporean counterparts.
So, how exactly were the PRC chaps inferior to the other
nationalities to the extent that it justified being paid less money than their
counterparts for doing the same job?
China is a developing country; its citizens can afford to
live on less – The Pittance they Earn here is a Fortune Where they Come From
Yes, China is developing and its people have lived on less
than most. However, this argument doesn’t exactly hold water. Contrary to what
many Singaporeans might like to think, migrants do bring their families over
and often have to support them.
Furthermore, while what one earns in one country might seem
like a fortune in another, the fact remains that most of us have to live in the
country that they work in. I remember that when I lived in England, it felt
like earning a salary in England would make me a rich man – everything penny
earned in England would be three times what it was in Singapore. Unfortunately that changed when I had to pay
bills in pounds.
So while one might comment about how people from China,
India, and Bangladesh etc are earning a fortune when converted into their
native currencies, they forget that our foreign labourers have to live in
Singapore and pay their respective bills in Singapore dollars. What they do
send back home has to be at a cost of denying themselves.
The closest anyone has to earning a strong currency and
spending in a weaker one are the Malaysians who live in Johor Bahru. The
distance between Singapore and Johor is reachable by train and bus. It is possible
to live in Johor and work in Singapore – earning Singapore dollars and spending
Ringitt is possible. It’s a different story for the chaps from Mainland China.
They can’t take a bus back to China every night and spend their hard earned
Singapore dollars in Chinese Yuan.
There are Official Channels they should not have taken
things into their own hands.
Yes, there are official channels. Workers in Singapore can
always go to their HR departments and if the HR departments don’t listen there
is always the regulatory authority, which in this case is the Ministry of
Manpower. If you are really desperate you can bring it to the courts.
While the system is wonderfully transparent on paper, there
is a major flow – going through it requires time and money. Lawyers for one have
never been known to be cheap and going through any government ministry requires
time.
While the Ministry of Manpower is considered effective in what it does,
it still takes 11-weeks to investigate claims made by workers against
employers. While it might not seem like much time to the bureaucratic machinery,
this is a lot of time for a worker, particularly the ones at the bottom of the
rung who have to feed themselves and are often forced to stay in accommodation provided
by the very employer they are making a complaint against.
Do you expect the economically disadvantaged to rush through
the system? Rightly or wrongly, the poor, particularly those from one-party
systems, don’t expect to get a fair deal.
Unfortunately, the Singapore system hasn’t exactly made
itself known to be particularly ‘labour-friendly.’ Let’s face it; abusing your
foreign domestic worker is less of a crime than libel against politicians. Our
system has allowed a contractor to keep his workers in conditions so harsh that
one of them died from chicken pox. Despite repeated calls to the police, nobody
did anything until someone died and when that happened, the courts slapped the
contractor in question with a mere $10,000 fine.
Contrary to what Singaporeans might believe, such stories do
get around the migrant communities. The system brags about how our courts work
for settling commercial disputes. While other system’s might show that the
small man can win in the courts once in a while, Singapore doesn’t bother to
announce those victories.
So, while the powers –that-be might talk about going through
official channels, we need to look at how ordinary people perceive the system.
If desperate people do not believe they have a fair chance of dealing with the
system, isn’t logical that they will look to get what they perceive to be
justice outside the system?
The Law Says You Have to Give Two Weeks’ Notice to Strike
Yes, this is technically and legally true. However, anyone
who expects people to follow this rule when they perceive the system to be
against them is living in lalala land. Sun Tzu argued that surprise was one of
the key elements of victory.
The Times Have Changed
Let’s face it, the bus drivers broke the letter of the law
and they will have to face the music. However, sweeping this incident under the
proverbial carpet would be a gross mistake. Whatever one might think of this "strike" the point is, the Chinese Bus Drivers have made people notice them and pay attention to their complaint. While one might bleat on about how they should have gone through the "proper channels," we have to ask ourselves if we'd even know about the pay discrepancy between Chinese and Malaysian Bus Drivers. Would we even know about dormitories?
Strikes can harm an economy. Let's look at the militant unions who crippled the UK economy in the 70s as an example of what not to accept.
However, no strikes are not necessarily an example of healthy industrial relations. Workers keep quiet because they need their jobs. Businesses do benefit with lower cost, including labour cost. However, there's a point when people will not except being treated unfairly or when you pay them at such levels where they are barely surviving. Just as people don't choose to be suicide bombers as a career choice, people don't go to work to strike for the sake of it.
So, SMRT and Singapore Inc needs to treat this as a wake up call to do something about bringing the management of industrial relations into the current era. The days when workers are willing to accept minimal wages as being good for society are long gone.