There was a discussion
in one of the chat groups that I’ve been part of, on the intrinsic selfishness
of the Chinese race (just about everyone in the group being ethnic Chinese).
One of the most famous examples of “Chinese Selfishness” is that of the Kung Fu
Master who only teaches 80 percent of what he knows because he (most of them
are men) do not want their students surpassing them.
As with many
stereotypes, there is an element of truth. In Singapore, we describe ourselves
as being “kiasu” or scared to lose. You could say that being kiasu means we
work harder so that we don’t lose out but at the same time, the kiasu mindset makes
us comically petty. One only has to think of the number of school kids who hide
reference books to ensure that no one else gets a chance to score higher marks
in a test. In fairness to Singapore, I’m told that it also happens in Hong
Kong.
This strange
mentality is not something that people grow out of. If anything, the kiasu mentality
is encouraged and carries on into the work place. It’s been said that in the professional
industry, firms try to keep young employees limited in silos so that they never
really learn the full extent of what their particular industry has to offer. As with the urban legend, we are a nation
filled with Kung Fu masters who are terrified of being surpassed by their
students and so they hoard knowledge in order to stay superior.
Ironically, one
of the people who lived a life that goes against this strange stereotypical Asian
mentality, was a hero to Asian boy living in the Western World. Bruce Lee was
the small Oriental guy who spent an entire lifetime showing smaller built Asian
guys that they could more than hold their own as long as they trained hard.
However, whilst
people like me grew up thinking of Bruce Lee as an “Asian Hero,” he was, in
fact, only able to do what he did because he had certain Un-Asian qualities to
his mindset. One of the most prominent things about him was the fact that he
was open to learning from other people and other styles and using techniques
that worked regardless of style.
One of the most
visible signs of this was in his relationship with Chuck Norris. If you talk to
enough people (especially Americans), you’ll always end up in a discussion on
who was would have won a fight. Its as if the two men needed to exist in a
rivalry in the way that tennis in the 1990s could only be seen through the
prism of the Sampras-Agassi rivalry.
The truth of
their relationship was rather different. Both men were friends and had great respect
for each other. The worked out together and swapped techniques. Chuck Norris once
described Bruce Lee as being “too good” to be his teacher. However, as Black
Belt magazine reports, the teacher student relationship wasn’t a one way thing.
Chuck Norris influenced Bruce Lee to use high kicks:
https://blackbeltmag.com/chuck-norris-influenced-bruce-lee
Bruce Lee
famously said argued that he was a “student-master,” or someone with the
expertise of a master but was constantly learning and seeking to improve.
Their students
become machines which imitate martial art forms." He was true to his word.
The man was famous for Chinese Wing-Chun, but also practiced Western boxing and
Eskrima (which he studied from his student Dan Inasanto).
If you think
about this man, you’ll see that his secret was openness to knowledge and an
understanding that the more knowledge he gave, the more he could absorb. The
man did not think of his special skill as making him part of a magic circle. He
said, “The other weakness is, when clans are formed, the people of a clan will
hold their kind of martial art as the only truth and do not dare to reform or
improve it. Thus, they are confined in their own tiny little world.”
One of his
greatest services to Kung-Fu was to teach Non-Chinese. Got into hot soup with
other kung-fu masters but the fact that he became identified with the art says
it all.
Let’s be honest
here – what Bruce Lee said about martial art cliques is true of professional cliques.
We study a profession. Then, we work in a profession in the same manner as our “masters.”
We only mix with fellow professionals and marry fellow professionals so that we
can produce kids who follow our profession. Mixing outside the profession
becomes sacrileges and it becomes a holy mission to spend your life bitching about
everyone in the profession to everyone in the profession because no one else
exists outside the profession.
Nobody sees the
idea of being like water where the professional is meant to serve the persona
and not the other way round. Remember someone said something to me about not
forgetting my profession of PR when I became a part-time waiter. My view was
different. I am not “PR” guy or a “F&B” guy or an “Insolvency” guy. I am
merely a guy who picked up a set of skills in one industry (PR) and used them
to be a little functional in two non-related industries (F&B and Corporate Insolvency).
I’ve reached the stage where I don’t want to be labelled as belonging to an industry
or a profession.
My refusal to
belong to a profession does make me a failure in Singapore. However, the world
is changing and reality doesn’t care about your magic circle just as the
reality of a punch in the face does not care if you are “Wing-Chun,” or “Boxing”
or “MMA,” or Taekwondo” guy.
No comments
Post a Comment