Since it’s the
Formula One (F1) weekend in Singapore and everyone is going to be focused on
who will win what could be a pretty intense race and what we’d call the thrill of
sporting competition.
F1 is the type
of event that the Government of Singapore gets very excited about. It’s
glamorous and attracts the world’s wealthy. The global TV cameras are focused
on Singapore, as the host to a lot of glamorous people.
However, the
truth is, that while F1 does attract a lot of attention, the race itself is
pretty dull. If you look at any given F1 race in the world, you’ll find that
they’re pretty predictable. Short of a major accident or a freak breakdown of
the car, the guy who starts out in front, usually stays there.
Like other
sports, F1 has its superstars like Senna, Schumacher and now Hamilton. However,
whilst the superstars get the media attention, the reality is that an F1 race
is won by a host of people whom you never see. Former racing driver, Nico Rosberg
has gone as far as to suggests that a F1 race is 80 percent car and 20 percent
driver:
https://onestopracing.com/formula-1-driver-or-car-which-is-more-important/
As with most
sports, F1 remains a fairly unequal place. Superstars earn millions just for doing
what they do. However, while being part of the pit crew doesn’t earn you
millions, it does pay well enough. Members are given a yearly salary and they
get bonuses for every race they work in. The reason is simple, the
manufacturers know that in F1, the superstars will need good pit crews to work for
them in order for the superstars to be superstars:
https://www.thefocus.news/sports/motorsport/f1/how-much-does-an-f1-pit-crew-make/
In a way, this
reality of F1 holds parallels in politics and in the management of a country. Like
an F1 team, countries get to shine when superstar drivers, be they
entrepreneurs, innovators and so on, but these guys won’t be able to win the
races if they don’t have a decent “pit crew” to support them.
If you take Mr.
Rosberg’s saying that 80 percent of the race is actually dependent on the car
and the pit crew, it means that most of your investment should actually be focused
on the car and the pit crew. Sure, a driver can make the difference, especially
at certain moments but those moments a few and far between. As mentioned
earlier, F1 races are predictable.
A similar
analogy can be made in Singapore’s “talent policy.” Now that Covid restrictions
are falling, we’re going on an all out to win the race for global talent, which
means that Singapore is going all out to win those on the ultra-high salary. As
I’ve often noted, nothing shows this more than when you deal with the Economic
Development Board (EDB), the government body that deals with bringing in big
companies into Singapore. Getting things out of EDB is like teaching a Hogwarts.
By contrast dealing with IE Singapore, the body responsible for helping
Singaporean businesses expand outside Singapore is like sitting in a dentist
chair.
While nobody is
against the idea of brining “talent” and “investment” from elsewhere, the truth
is that the backbone of our economy remains in the SME sector or in F1 speak – “Pit
Crew” companies. I think of my favourite data analytics entrepreneur who is
from India. He said “You’d get a lot more return on your investment if you put
the money you spend on bringing foreign investors into your start-up sector.”
It's this
simple truth – superstars can leave and are conditioned to go where the best
offer is. Aryton Sena was winning at McLaren. Then, when he lost the
championship to Nigel Mansell in his
Williams car, he promptly jumped ship to Williams (his last team – died at the San
Marino Grand Prix). The pit crew at McLaren stayed and they worked
until they produced another winning car for their new superstar, Lewis Hamilton
many years later.
If we invested
in the pit crew, we’d develop a far more resilient economy. The superstars will
go to the place that gives them the best support, which means where the best pit
crews are. However, superstars who do not bring pit crews along. It’s something
the government should consider in when thinking of our talent development.
No comments
Post a Comment