Ever since I
started watching more Netflix, I’ve started to appreciate how art and life imitate
each other. Sometimes, its possible to draw news commentary from movies, as it
so happened when I saw a story in Mothership, which described how our Second
Minister of Finance, Ms. Indranee Rajah ended up arguing with Non-Constituency
Member of Parliament, Mr. Leong Mun Wai over the funding that the government
was handing out to SPH Media Trust, the non-profit that had taken over the
entire media business from what was then called Singapore Press Holdings (SPH),
a listed for-profit company. The story can be found at:
https://mothership.sg/2022/10/leong-mun-wai-public-expenditure-indranee-rajah/
The argument between Ms. Rajah and Mr. Leong centred around the issue as to why it was necessary for the tax payer to fund what had been until recently a license for printing money. Ms. Rajah, it seems, took issue to the fact that Mr. Leong seemed to imply that this subsidy to the media was an implication that the government was not being prudent.
Since, I am
earning below the rate of competence (pegged at $500,000 a year), I shall leave
the debate on financial management to the people earning the rate of
competence. However, what I will point out is that moving the print business
into a non-profit and funding it is a sign of what is perhaps the biggest
problem in Singapore – a lack of competition.
As a whole, one
of the biggest gripes that Singaporeans have is that, we live in a competitive society.
If you listen to enough young parents at play, competition is thrust upon every
Singaporean before they’re born. Parents start competing for places in the best
day care centres long while the kid is the womb and school is essentially a cut
throat place, where kids are not only expected to ace exams but get involved in
the right extracurricular activities and so on. Competition doesn’t stop there.
When you start work, you enter a “rat-race” to earn the biggest and best pay
checks to live in increasingly expensive housing and to drive increasingly
expensive cars. Add to that, the government is now trying to get us to compete
in having more children, who will be better and brighter than everyone else.
So, as far as
the average Singaporean is concerned, we live in a ruthless place and you can’t
afford to be a nice person. I remember my ex-wife yelling at me whenever I thought
it was ok to chill out instead of planning for the big wedding she was hoping
for. Her most common phrase being “This is NOT an ANG MOH (White man) COUNTRY –
THIS IS SINGAPORE.”
However, while
competition for every little thing in Singapore can seem a little intense to
most, we aren’t exactly the competitive society that we like to portray
ourselves as. While school kids face competition of the most intense sort,
there’s actually very little “real” competition for grown-ups or more
specifically “special” grownups. If anything, competition is regarded as
something that is only for the poor and stupid.
Our scholarship
system is the prime example of this. We take our best and brightest and train
them at the world’s best universities. Then, we give them good, stable jobs in
the government. Original concept of getting the best and brightest to serve the
nation is not wrong. However, the act of removing these guys from facing any
form of competition has meant that we end up wasting the best and brightest and
dealing with competition is left to people below the rate of competence.
Let’s think
about it. We are supposed to have the world’s best government (hence we pay
more than anyone else for our ministers). We have the “best” people running our
home grown “big brands.” Yet despite 57-years of Independence our manpower
policy is only about attracting people from elsewhere to do the jobs rather
than encouraging Singaporeans to go overseas and make their mark.
Take our “Rolls
Royce” ministers for example. As far as I know, only George Yeo went onto take
a top job outside of Singapore and more importantly outside anything controlled
by the Singapore government when he became Chairman and Executive Director of
Kerry Logistics. I remember when I worked on 3M’s PR in the early 2000s, it was
considered exciting news to have a Singaporean running 3M’s HR department. When
we complain about Indian nationals running the local branch of a multinational,
we forget that India (admittedly a small segment of India) does produce people
like Ajay Banga former CEO of Master Card and Indra Nooyi, former CEO of Pepsico.
It’s much tougher to think of a Singaporean, educated in the system who ran
anything outside the HR department in an organisation not controlled by the
Singapore government.
The best explanation
for this is found in two scenes in Rocky III. The first is when Micky wants to
walk out on Rocky for taking Clubber Lang’s challenge because he believes that
Rocky is going to be “killed,” His argument is simple – Rocky has not been hungry
since he won the belt and has become “civilised,” whilst Clubber is hungry and
has become a “wrecking machine.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONit4ATZmhw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXykRUEIchY
Any native-born
Singaporean with the “eye of the tiger” is encouraged to become “civilised.”
Life becomes comfortable. Prime example is our one and only Olympic God Medallist,
who had the “eye of the tiger” before 2016. He faced competition in the
American eco-system from hungry competitors. His form has been, well, a little
off since he won the medal, came home and became “civilised” by the Singapore
Government.
Logic has it
that a government stuffed by people who believe competition is for the little
people, will not want hungry journalist talking to them. It is easier to fund
them than to have them become like British regional media, which jumped at the
chance to ask the tough questions of the Prime Minister, which the national
media admitted they would have refrained from (regional media only speaks to Number
10 once every five years, national media by contrast worry about being cut off
from access).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q0rlT-5oxE
There is, as they say, a difference between the media asking “where were you,” and the media explaining why you weren’t there during a crisis.
No comments
Post a Comment