One of the nicest things that I’ve done was also one of the stupidest. I was a student in London and I befriended a Canadian tramp called Murphy. In a moment of kindness, I led him into my flat to take a shower in return for cleaning my bathroom. When he went to shower, it occurred to me that things could go south, so I stood in a corner and held onto my Swiss Army knife telling myself that I better be prepared for a nasty outcome. Thankfully nothing happened and Murphy did his part and eventually got himself off the streets.
However, it occurred
to me as I was holding the knife that I was pretty screwed if Murphy suddenly
chose to turn nasty. I would, at best be robbed, dead if he had gotten the
better of me in a fight and used the knife against me or in jail if I had
gotten the better of him and used the knife. I was very lucky but had I not
been, I was screwed whichever way things went. Murphy on the other hand, had
nothing to lose. He would either have walked off with something of mine, died
(which given the way his life had been, was a viable option) or in jail (which
would have meant three square meals a day and a warm bed, which was a lot more
than what he was getting on the streets).
I tell this
story because one of the things that many of us forget is that there are people
out there who have “nothing to lose and everything to gain,” when we deal with
them. At the very worst, most of us have a roof over our heads, even if its
just a one-room HDB. Our inability to understand the concept of “nothing to lose,”
has coloured our view of things. Talk to Singaporeans about the Palestinian or
Tibetan issue and the reply will inevitably is inevitably “why do they bother
protesting – the other side is way stronger and richer.” As far as most of us
are concerned, the fight is not worth it if you’re going to lose anyway. What
we never seem to understand is that you’re talking about people who have the
reached the point where they believe that there’s nothing to lose.
The main point
is that people who have everything to gain and nothing to lose, make dangerous
opponents. People who have nothing to gain and everything to lose by contrast
are easy opponents. As was made in the classic “Rocky III,” the guy with nothing
to lose goes all out to wreck you, while the guy with nothing gain holds back.
Hence,
governments, like the Singapore government work very hard to ensure that the population
never reach the “nothing to lose” stage. If anything, the Singapore government peddles
the story that “You have everything to gain” provided you follow the “right”
path.
To be fair, this
was the case for many years. People went to school and then got good jobs. With
the exception of a few opposition politicians, life seemed fairly comfortable.
Nobody rocked the boat because there was no need to.
This trend is
clear in the evolution of the Singapore media. Clement Masenas, who led the
last journalist strike in 1971 was once quoted as saying that the journalist
victory in the strike was a pyrrhic victory. The journalist got much better pay
– in fact far better than they imagined and they lost all incentive to question
the government that had ensured they got their hefty pay increase.
This was seen
very clearly in the early 2000s, when our late Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew was
interviewed by young journalists. A few people wrote into complain that the journalists
were not giving Mr. Lee the due difference, without realising that Mr. Lee had
behind the scenes made them do several takes until they were critical enough in
their questioning.
Think of how
silly this sounds? Young journalists in most places are the most “aggressive,” because
they’re hungry to build a name and they effectively have nothing to lose. Bob
Woodward and Carl Bernstein could break the Watergate story because they
effectively had everything to gain and nothing to lose. Doesn’t happen here
because the young believe they have everything to lose if they go against the official
line. What aspiring journalist is going to p** off a ruling politician when it
could end a career before it starts.
In the UK, the
situation is different. Young journalists, particularly in the obscure regional
mediums, have far less to lose when it comes to dealing with national politicians.
Think of Liz Truss’s recent series of interviews where young journalists said
things like “Where have you been?” Or, “Are you ashamed?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q0rlT-5oxE
So, here’s the
moral of the story – never drive anyone to a point where they have nothing to
lose by going after you, even if you have significantly more power and money.
Someone who is determined to bring you down and believes they have nothing to
lose, will do unexpected and unpleasant things to you if they believe it is
what is necessary.
No comments
Post a Comment