Call it a coincidence if you will but after attending
the Singapore Insolvency Conference hosted in the ParkRoyal Collection MarinaBay, an old friend of mine, whom I had once worked for, called me up to ask
about liquidating a business of his.
I described this entire conversation with my friend as
being “unusual” because I’ve found that in the last decade of being in the
insolvency trade; I’ve found that many business owners tend to leave closing
down a business to late and liquidation is forced upon them.
I’ve noticed that it’s usually the Asian business
owners, specifically the Chinese ones in the old-fashioned business-like retail
and construction who tend to leave it late. I guess a good part of the reason
for this is cultural. For the traditional Chinese businessman, the business is inevitably
more than a vehicle to make money – its part of the family legacy. Hence, liquidation
is a taboo topic because you’re not talking about ending an entity but your very
existence in the community. I still remember Gina’s father being upset with me
for taking the PPO against her for the simple reason that the court sent
someone to serve her and when he opened the door it was “people think I owe
money.”
So, I get the reason why people fight tooth and nail
to keep things afloat even when the signs are clearly obvious. However, the sad
reality that economic waters are increasingly choppy. Despite the “rosy” image
of entrepreneurship that gets sold to every young person these days, the
statistics for being successful and staying successful as an entrepreneur are
pretty grim. According to Clarify Capital, some 80 percent of businesses fail within
20 years:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Chances+of+succeeding+in+business
Everyone loves venture capitalist. They threw
glamorous parties and everyone sucks up to them in the belief that they hold
the keys to a glorious future. By contrast, insolvency practitioners (IP) tend
to stick to their own kind, mixing occasionally with insolvency lawyers. Let’s
just look at the medical analogy of gynecologists (my stepfather being one)
being more socially acceptable than morticians.
Yet beneath the glitz of new business launches, the
truth is more nuanced. The rough statistic is that venture capitalist lose
money in nine of ten ventures backed – it’s just that the one that succeeds
does so in a manner that covers the losses of the other nine and ensures the
venture capitalists success. The IPs whilst occupying a less glamorous space
have a more consistent flow of work.
If you take the statistics about business failure, the
one key element of a successful entrepreneur is inevitably one who can accept
failure. Successful entrepreneurs view failure as part of the learning curve
and will look at the IP as a source of knowledge rather than a person to be
avoided. The very nature of being in the insolvency trade means one is going to
see a lot of business failure and develop certain insights that most would not
have. Its one of the reasons why prominent characters in our judicial system
are being invited to speak at insolvency conferences:
Its this simple, when things turn south and look like
they’re never going to get better, it’s best to cut one’s losses.
Firstly, there are laws against insolvent trading. In
layman terms, when the hole is getting deeper – stop digging. This is something
that few if any outside the insolvency business will be aware of. However, just
because one isn’t aware, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
Secondly, there’s the fact that I’ve often said to a
few bankrupts – you still have your brains and contacts. Business failure provides
one with the opportunity to understand one’s weaknesses. Hence, the adage that
one not starts from nothing but from experience. Letting go of an old business gives
one more time to work on starting again.



No comments
Post a Comment