As a student, I was brought up with the idea that one of the most dangerous figures in modern history was Rupert Murdoch. This was in the 1990s and Mr. Murdoch owned a good portion of the British Press, in particular the Sun, which was the most widely read paper and at the higher end of the market, he owned the Times. When the Times started selling copies at GBP 1 per copy, my deputy headmaster gave an assembly talk about how Mr. Murdoch was cutting the price of his high end paper to gain control of young minds.
My deputy head
had a point. Mr. Murdoch owns a good chunk of the media in the Western World. This
position makes him valued by politicians in the UK and the US for a good reason.
I’m old enough to remember the 1992 election in the UK, when the conservatives
under John Major pulled off an upset. The Sun declared “It’s the Sun Wot Won
It.” So, much for political neutrality of the media. The headline was not lost
on a young Labour MP called Tony Blair, who made it a point of courting Rupert
Murdoch when he became leader of the Labour Party. Mr. Blair subsequently won a
landslide in 1997 and stayed in the top job for a good decade.
While Mr.
Murdoch has plenty of influence in the politics of the Western World, there are
times when the system does bite back. In 2011, his paper, The News of the World
got shut down by order of Parliament after they were illegally hacking into
phones and bribing police. More recently, Mr. Murdoch has had to take a stand in
a law suite brought by Dominion Voting System against Fox News, which owned by
Rupert Murdoch.
The key point
from this trial is that Mr. Murdoch admitted that his hosts knew that theories
about voter fraud in the 2020 election were false and yet they promoted the
theory that the election was stolen because they needed the ratings. Mr.
Murdoch has now famously said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdhvZ1yQ_nE
Mr. Murdoch is
probably what you’d call an old school newspaper tycoon, who happily gives the paper
buying and tv viewing public what they want. Politicians see him as a friend and
threat while the public don’t care as long as he provides them with content
they want.
However, as the
case with Fox News is showing, one has to ask if the media needs to be held to
certain standards and who should enforce them? There’s something clearly wrong
in the opinion section of Fox News, where the anchors know that certain people
are lying but they still get to promote the lies because its good for business.
However, do we need the other extreme, as happens in the Singapore mainstream,
where editors effectively edit government press releases (The no fail PR strategy
in Singapore – get the government to send the press release – it effectively
becomes an order to attend events).
A model of
balance could be found in the UK, where there editors and producers are allowed
to make judgements on the news value of a story without fear of how it might
make certain members of the government feel. However, at the same time, there
are regulatory bodies like Ofcom, that have the power to take the media to task
should they cross certain lines.
Societies do
need to find that balance and the problem that old school tycoons like Mr.
Murdoch are giving way to a myriad of niche players like the infamous Alex Jones
of infoWars. However, whilst the task is challenging, it must be done.
No comments
Post a Comment