Thursday, 5 January 2023 marked the end of an era for
Singapore. We, on this red dot, woke up to the news that Mr. Sim Wong Hoo, the
founder and CEO of Creative Technologies (“Creative”) had died at the age of
67. The news report is as follows:
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/sim-wong-hoo-dies-creative-technology-founder-ceo-3184226
Mr. Sim was remarkable man and he was that most precious
of commodities and something that is much needed in the Singapore system – a visionary.
The great and good of Singapore are paying tributes to Mr. Sim and he’s been
described as a “legend.”
There’s no doubt that Mr. Sim deserves the praise. His
story is more typical of Silicon Valley than Singapore, a society that prides
itself in creating conformist and while Mr. Sim himself was never politically controversial,
he’s the living example of why
one should ignore traditional expectations (or in the case of Singapore
government mandated expectations).
I think back to
an interview that Lee Kuan Yew once gave. He argued that whilst Singapore and
other small countries could do well in the world, they could never build
anything significant because they lacked economies of scale. Well, Mr. Sim
proved him wrong – the Sound Blaster card became a global standard for sound in
computers.
Then, Mr. Sim
defied stereotypes of Asian prosperity being about copying from the West and
having no innovation. He tried to conquer the market for portable music through
“Zen.” Unfortunately, he lost that battle. Only this time he lost the battle to
Steve Jobs and Apple. He wasn’t afraid to compete with the best in the world outside
his comfort zone.
While Creative is
a smaller company than it was during its glory days, Mr. Sim was, until the end
still brimming with ideas as the following interview with Channel NewAsia suggests:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5by58vI8VxE
What should be
noted is that when he had a product, he went to the government and got turned
down. Let’s not mince words here, its most likely that our civil servants could
not accept the idea of a non-scholar from a polytechnic would have the audacity
to come up with anything ground breaking. Thankfully for Mr. Sim, the Americans
were willing to back him and he was only recognised in Singapore by the powers
that be when Creative got listed on the NASDAQ.
Mr. Sim,
himself, summed things up in his book “Creative Thoughts from the Old Millennium,
where he described the subservient mindset of our local population through the
term “NUTS,” or “No U-Turn Syndrome.” More on NUTS can be found below:
Let’s think
about it, Mr. Sim grew up in an era where geography mattered. When Singapore
rejected him, he uprooted and went to the USA to seek funding before there was
an internet or a developed VC industry.
It’s not to say
that Singapore hasn’t produced innovators. We have Tan Min-Liang of Razer inc
and Henn Tan, the CEO of Trek200 International, the company that invented the
USB. A list of some prominent innovations to come out of Singapore can be found
at:
https://thebrilliant.com.au/case-studies/10-inventions-from-singapore-that-solve-global-challenges/
There is a notable
trend in this list. Government plays a role in innovation in a very direct way.
On the positive side, you can argue that government can play a role in fostering
a decent eco-system for innovative entrepreneurship.
However, this
tends to work only if the government is interested in a certain sector. In Singapore’s
case, government led innovation works for companies like Shiok Meats or the
entire vertical farming sector where the government has an interest in say
developing “food security.”
What happens
when innovation is not in the government’s interest? In his blog, Emanuel
Daniel, publisher of the Asian Banker, has argued that the government has
hobbled innovation in finance, forcing Fintech companies to be contractors to
banks rather than competitors. Here’s the question, would the government allow
innovation in the construction sector if it meant less need for foreign workers
and therefore less levy?
Let’s not kid
ourselves – government does play an important role in fostering innovation. On
paper, Singapore’s government does well in terms of providing a legal and financial
infrastructure.
However, can
the government except the fact that innovation does from people who don’t fit a
particular mold like Mr. Sim? Mr. Sim remains someone who was willing to go up
against the biggest and best, which was the thing that made him pioneer on the
world stage. Can the government accept both these parts of future Mr. Sim’s? For
Singapore’s sake, let’s hope so.
No comments
Post a Comment