One of the most cringeworthy things going around my social media feed concerns a headline run in the Straits Times (Singapore’s leading daily) about the Beijing Winter Olympics, which are going on at the moment:
As two of the people circulating this have pointed out, the headline is not true. There are a number of countries who have hosted both the Summer and Winter versions of the Olympics. Beijing is the “first” city to have hosted both the Summer (Back in 2008) and Winter versions of the Olympics. There is, as they say, a difference between China the country and Beijing, the city.
The editors have been rightly lambasted for this
oversight. This is, as they say, the type of factual error you expect from a
primary school kid and not a national newspaper. The layers of editors and
subeditors that bring a newspaper to print should have seen this. Then, there’s
the fact that the newspaper in question has now become part of a non-profit
that is funded by the government. Why is the tax payer being forced to fund an
editorial team that can’t get its facts right?
For me, the major issue with this simple error is the
fact that it reflects a troubling ignorance about the world outside Singapore. Although
I’ve been living in Singapore for the last 22-years, I still get stunned by the
level of ignorance of basic geography. I think someone from Saudi Aramco
telling me that people had asked him “Which part of Dubai are you from” when he
told them he was Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabia being significantly larger than
Dubai). Many Singaporeans still think that Punjabis (specifically the Sikhs)
are from Bengal (there’s a huge distance between Punjab and Bengal) and I’m
brought back to the dinner where one of the guests proudly asked, “Where is Bahrain?”
There are people who talk about “Hindis” and “Indians” as if they were two
different things. Contrary to what most Singaporeans might think, the national
language of India is actually Hindi and you cannot gain national pride in being
ignorant.
In a way, the only other place where I’ve been to
where this type of ignorance about the world exists, is in America. As a
Singaporean, one might find oneself explaining to people that Singapore is not
part of China.
However, our ignorance about the world is worse than the ignorance found elsewhere. Let’s face it, America is a huge place
where most people spend their lives in their home town. When my stepdad lived
in the Appalachian Mountains of Kentucky, he found that the locals had no
concept of where New York was. In a way, you can’t blame them because they live
in a world where everything they need is right at home. Why does a Hill Billy
in the Appalachian Mountains need to know about New York when everything he
needs is right at home?
That’s not the case for us. We are a small island with
no resources of our own. Our very existence is based on trading with the
outside world. Unlike my stepdad’s former neighbours, you cannot grow your food
and live in your own bubble in Singapore. At any given point in your life, you
will need to deal with someone from somewhere else in order to exists.
Singapore, as we’ve reminded ourselves on so many occasions,
is a “Red Dot.” The outside world doesn’t need to know about us but we need to
know about the word outside. If anything, we need to be smarter about the world
than the world is about itself.
Like with many things in Singapore, the government
actually has responsibility for this state of affairs. We are, if you listen to
propaganda, an exceedingly well-educated place. We reached the 100 literacy
rate mark ages ago. Apparently, we build “world class” educational institutions
and we are constantly building “world-class” research facilities and getting “world-class”
researchers to set up shop in Singapore. Our often-repeated mantra is that “We
have no resources other than our human resources,” and so we need to invest in
our people.
The obsession with “education” reaches out to the
press. Whilst the government reminds the press that Singapore does not need a “Fourth
Estate,” that it has a social responsibility to “educate” people.
However, as the confusion between China the country
and Beijing the city shows, we need to ask if our “educators” are themselves
educated. If you go through any of our top institutions (mostly government ones),
you’ll find that there are lots of people who have graduated with good degrees
from “world-class” universities. Yet they remain ignorant of the world outside their own and you have to ask if they are really educated at all.
One of the most worrying examples came from my stints
of working with the Saudi Government, where I learnt to drop certain Arabic phrases
when speaking with Arabs because it helped break the ice. However, at one Saudi
function, I realized that the three phrases of Arabic I knew where three phrases
more than the average person working at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) knew.
I remember a girl from MFA gushing about my command of Arabic after witnessing
me drop my three phrases with the Saudis, a community that she was paid to build
a relationship with.
I’m a guy who was told by a senior civil servant at
MFA that I would never get hired because MFA did not consider my “honours” from
a British University to be honours at all. However, when dealing with people from elsewhere, I do
try to talk to them in their context so that they can understand mine. I’ve
found out that I am a weird person for doing this.
Sure, I understand that you can’t know everything
about everywhere but at least the curious enough to find out about the places
you have to deal with. Like it or not, China, India, the Middle East and Africa
are markets that we need in order to grow. We have to be interested enough to do
a Google search about certain places when meeting people from different parts
of the world. Ignorance about the rest of the world is not bliss when you are a
small trading nation. The government needs to be put “curious” people in charge
to “educate” the masses rather than robots to train more robots.
No comments
Post a Comment