Before Donald Trump came to power and made America the world standard of comedy, the British used to make some of the funniest shows around. In the 70s there was Monty Python and these days, it’s the various characters like Ali-G, Borat and Bruno who send us all into stitches. Like his 1970s predecessors, Mr. Sacha Baron Cohen (the man who is Ali-G, Borat and Bruno) has become a global icon by being very silly.
What’s striking
about Britain’s “Silly” exports, is the fact that all of them have great
degrees from world class universities. The Python’s and Mr. Sasha Baron Cohen are
from the University of Cambridge. Mr. Rowan Atkinson (Black Adder and Mr. Bean)
is an engineering student from the University of Oxford. As one of my dearest
friends from the UK said, “It takes brains to be very silly.
You’d Never
Guess these guys came from:
These
established universities.
My friend’s
point wasn’t limited to comedy. It also existed in journalism. British Tabloids
like the Sun were designed to the lowest common denominator (or the type of
reader who doesn’t care what news is being reported on as long as the paper has
a picture of a girl with nice tits on page 3. They were world masters at
producing the most sensationalized headlines that were designed to stir up
passions. The Sun is one of those papers where you’d probably not want to be
caught buying.
Leaving aside
my personal feelings towards the Sun, it’s actually a work of art. It takes
brains to come up with those headlines. Whilst people like me would turn our
noses up at the Sun and take pride in reading things like The Times, Guardian,
Telegraph or Financial Times, the truth of the matter is that the top graduates
from journalism school ended up working for the Sun. It takes far more brains
to write for the less discerning.
When I came
back and started working in Singapore, I realized that this wasn’t a
particularly British thing. Singapore
has the phenomena of “It takes brains to be stupid.”
Unfortunately,
our local version of this, isn’t intentionally funny. This becomes especially
true when you look at how the Government Linked Corporations (GLCs) have done.
All these firms are nominally part of the private sector. More often than not,
they are listed on the stock exchange and management is accountable to
shareholders. They all have very health balance sheets and are either in a
monopoly or duopoly in the home market. The uniting factor is that the largest
shareholder is Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd, which is in turn owned by the Ministry
of Finance. Whilst the government states that it merely owns shares, its
perhaps no coincidence that the guys running these companies are more often
than not, former civil servants (usually generals) who went to the best
universities in the world at the government’s expense.
To say that the
performance of these companies has been lackluster is charitable. The only
notable exceptions are SIA, which competes in an industry where government
protection is of no use (Singapore’s air space is only so big) and to a certain
extent SingTel, the former Telco monopoly which had the good sense to use its cash
pile to buy companies overseas (biggest cash spinners being Optus in Australia
and Bharti in India) and DBS Bank, which has been run by people from elsewhere
since 1998, when John Olds, an American who had never run a bank before, was appointed
as CEO.
When you consider
the advantages that all these companies have, the question remains – how could
they not make money? To use a sporting analogy, it would be like cloning Cristiano
Ronaldo into 11 players and putting them onto a soccer pitch to play against 11
bedridden one-legged grandfathers, with the referee under pressure to ensure
the team of Cristiano Ronaldo’s would have a super serum to make them play even
more magically whilst the bedridden grandfathers would have more limbs tied up
and yet, despite this, the team of Cristiano Ronaldo clones would lose.
The example I personally
dealt with is Ez Link Pte Ltd, which somehow lost $17 million in 2003. This is
a company that was wholly owned by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) had a
monopoly on a product that just about everyone in the country had to use every
day (think of the number of rides on the public transport system every day). The
company collected one percent of the value of every transaction (think of 1
cent per person times two million and the only real cost being the few staff
members and rent of the office). The best part to this system is that money was
collected upfront (they don’t get paid when you tap – they get paid when you
top up your card). You would think that this was a business that would print
money even if you staffed it with zoo animals.
On a larger
scale, we had the SMRT system, which is run by a former Chief of Defense Force
(CDF), who took over the CEO job from his predecessor as CDF. The first former
General became a hero to his shareholders when he made money for them by
selling the entire operation back to them. His tenure as CEO was marked with
consistent train breakdowns, which were all due to the fact that there was,
apparently a lack of funds for basic maintenance. This is despite the fact that
the SMRT sells a service that nearly everyone in the country uses and in
addition to that, they are sitting on some of the most valuable rental
properties in the country. Yet, somehow there was no money for maintenance and
the only way to make money for the shareholders was by selling the business to
the shareholders.
Another former
CDF (to be a top general in Singapore you need to be very clever – an Oxbridge
degree is the minimal qualification) showing us how to make a mess of things is
Ng Yat Chung who has famously failed to make money in not one but two
businesses. In the five years of being CEO of Neptune Orient Line (NOL), Mr. Ng
failed to make a profit and left his shareholders with no choice but to sell NOL
to CMA-CGM, who promptly turned it around in a matter of months.
His reward was
to be moved to the helm of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), the owner of every
newspaper in Singapore bar one and collector of more than half of every dollar
spent on media space in Singapore. In his tenure as CEO of SPH, Mr. Ng has seen
SPH kicked off the Straits Times Industrial Index (an irony given that the
Straits Times is SPH’s main product) and on 6 May 2021, Mr. Ng had to call a
press conference to announce that the loss-making newspapers would be spun off
into a “non-profit” company. Fortunately for Mr. Ng, he proceeded to turn
himself into a laughing stock by raising his voice at a reporter who had the
audacity to ask him about editorial integrity.
I say fortunately because the attention was focused incident and his use
of the word “umbrage” and how he bragged about not being a gentleman than on
the main issue of how he managed to turn a profitable quasi-monopoly into a
begging bowl from the tax payer. The report on Mr. Ng’s press conference can be
found at:
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/sph-ceo-ng-yat-chung-question-editorial-integrity-122702142.html
Again, Mr. Ng is
very clever. His academic credentials put him the global elite. Yet, somehow,
he’s managed to turn powerful market leading businesses into loss making ones.
We always tell
ourselves that we only have our human resources and that our “reserves” are to
be guarded because you never know when you need the money for a rainy day. Yet,
somehow, we seem determined to take our best and brightest to turn businesses with
business models that zoo animals could print money from into loss making
ventures. I’m not getting it…perhaps smarter readers could explain this to me.
No comments
Post a Comment