The Chinese Year of the Goat is starting on a rather
auspicious note for Singapore. The Goat Year, which is supposed to be a fairly
gentle year, started out with the news that Singapore’s founding Prime
Minister, Lee Kuan Yew had been taken to hospital and is now on “life support.”
While we should wish Mr. Lee a recovery, we are witnessing an end of an era.
Mr. Lee has been visibly frail since the death of his wife in 2010 and at the
age of 91, he’s lived beyond the two score and ten recommended by the Bible.
His passing should be something that we expect.
While Mr. Lee has remained out of the public eye since he
resigned from the Cabinet after the 2011 Election, he’s been the driving force
of modern Singapore. I remember a prominent journalist describing as the “Era
of Lee Kuan Yew,” and he went on stress that this was despite the fact that,
“Lee Hsien Loong [Mr. Lee Kuan Yew’s son] is now the Prime Minister and Goh
Chok Tong was the Prime Minister for 14-years.”
Mr. Lee was our first Prime Minister. He and his initial
governments played a role in creating the policies and institutions that have
made Singapore what it is. Mr. Lee was a great visionary. He insisted on things
like integrity in the public service and promotion by merit.
Not only was Mr. Lee a visionary, but he also had the rare
gift of being a visionary with a pragmatic streak. He had the good sense to
surround himself with competent deputies like Goh Keng Swee and Rajaratnam. Mr
Lee fought the political battles and allowed his deputies (especially Dr. Goh)
to get on with the work.
The results of his vision and pragmatism are visible.
Singapore is now a thriving, prosperous, green and safe metropolis. Despite its
limited geography, Singapore is held up as a model of what a city should be.
The emerging Asian giants, China and India have sent government officials to
Singapore to study how Mr. Lee did. India’s recently elected Prime Minister,
Narendra Modhi is a fan of Mr. Lee.
While Mr. Lee did some nasty things like ruin his political
opponents (there are political prisoners who have been incarcerated longer than
either Nelson Mandela or Ang Sung Su Kyi), he has been on the whole a good
force for Singapore. Let’s face it, Singapore measures up pretty well in just
about everything and these days that comparison is not with third world backwaters
like Angola but with the developed nations of the West like the USA and members
of the European Union.
So, why aren’t Singaporeans, especially the younger
generation showing much emotion over the possible demise of the man who was
probably the root cause of the good life that they enjoy.
My personal feeling is that Mr. Lee forgot one of the most
important lessons of business – never fall in love with your own business. The
man who made “succession planning” and obsession couldn’t help but to create
consultancy positions in the cabinet of his successors. He was Mr. Goh Chok
Tong’s “Senior Minister,” and then, when his own son took over, he became the “Minister
Mentor,” or the man they still needed around to “mentor” the people he chose to
run the country.
While nobody can doubt Mr. Lee’s wisdom and the fact that he’s
been right about so many of the crucial issues, there comes a point when one
forgets that times change and the methods that worked yesterday may not work
today. You could say that Mr. Lee was the father of the nation and he was the
father that forgot that the children had grown up.
One of the most common failings was to stick onto the myth
that he and his party created – they were the party that brought the nation
from swamp to thriving metropolis in a generation.
While the PAP and Mr. Lee deserve credit for bringing
Singapore up in the world, the message had become lost on a generation that
never lived through things like the Japanese Occupation or the riots of the
60s. There’s no point telling a retrenched manager with a mortgage and family
to feed that he has it easy when compared to the generation that survived the
Japanese occupation. What he wants is to find a way of making a living so he
can feed the family.
There were also times when the obsession with the past
record was more than just out of touch – it was self-serving. One of the worst
moments came when Mr. Lee proceeded to sold Singaporeans for being complacent
about national security when there were calls for the Minister in charge of
national security to resign after that Minister allowed a terrorist to waltz
out of a secured facility. Mr. Lee was known for being ruthless with his own
ministers in extracting the highest standards and competence and integrity.
Suddenly he was proudly defending the incompetence of his son’s ministers. To a
generation of Singaporeans who had grown up thinking of Mr. Lee as a great man
who did things for the nation, this was a rude shock. Had he grown to love his
power more than his people?
As a young Singaporean, I find Mr. Lee’s demise sad but hopeful.
The man had faults and his frailties. These weaknesses have damaged certain
aspects of Singapore. However, when you compare him to his contemporaries in
Southeast Asia, he did place some safeguards against himself. Singapore’s
elections are really run in a “free and fair manner” (the ballot is secret,
even if the ruling party may like you to think otherwise.) Mr. Lee did step
aside in 1991, unlike Suharto who had to be pushed and confined to house arrest
or Marcos who had to flee the nation.
If one looks at Mr. Lee’s family, you
have to hand it to him for ensuring they stayed in line and played by the
rules. Our current Prime Minister was required to take the same exams that
everyone else took. As a reservist colonel pointed out, “Lee Hsien Loong and
Lee Hsien Yang went to OCS (Officer Cadet School) and trained – they did not
get 12-year deferments of National Service and then got posted to study soil.”
The Elder Mr. Lee has kept certain things in line, which many of his contemporaries
did not – one only has to go back to how the Suharto family seemed to own as
well as run Indonesia.
You could say Mr. Lee’s problem was to set high standards
for public officials and the angst that many Singaporeans feel towards the once
almighty government is the fact that they feel its moved away from the
standards that Mr. Lee set.
It would take courage to admit this but should any
government recognize and act of these mistakes, they would have secured Mr. Lee’s
decent legacy for the betterment of Singapore.
1 comment
/// As a young Singaporean, I find Mr. Lee’s demise sad but hopeful. ///
You know something that I don't? Or, are you cursing him?
Post a Comment