My sister got married to her partner yesterday in an
outdoor ceremony. It was a beautiful ceremony. Our patchwork family came together
from as far as Australia, Singapore and the USA. On her partner’s side, they
came as far as Sierra Leone in West Africa. This was an event filled with
plenty of laughter and not to mention good food.
I bring up my sister’s wedding because in Singapore
finally managed to repeal that most pointless of laws, 377A at the end of 2022.
The law, which criminalises sexual relations between men had been something of
a controversial topic and it took several years before the Government agreed to
remove this colonial era law.
You could, I guess, argue that it was a tough act for
the government to carry out. While the LGBTQ community in Singapore had argued
that the law was discriminatory, there were also the voices of the shrill “conservatives”
who argued that allowing homosexual behaviour would lead to the collapse of
society.
I’ve argued that no matter what one thinks of the
LGBTQ community, the law was clearly pointless. It didn’t protect anyone except
repressed homosexuals who needed the law to protect them from being themselves.
I believe a former Chief Justice and two former Attorney-Generals have said as
much even if they expressed it in much better terms. So, I am happy that the
Singapore Government has finally seen the obvious – that every argument made in
favour of keeping the law has been proven to be nonsensical.
However, there was a compromise. In return for lifting
377A, marriage is enshrined in the Singapore constitution as being between a
man and a woman. Hence, while the LGBTQ can legally have sex with their chosen
partners, their rights to have their relationships protected still does not exist.
Should this matter? The Nordic countries for example,
are filled with couples who happily live together and have children but do so
without that contract called marriage. Surely our LGBTQ community can do the
same.
Ironically, it was Ms. Stephanie Thio of TSMP Law (Ms.
Thio is the sister-in-law of Professor Thio Li-Ann, Singapore’s most prominent
anti-gay activist) who argued that we need to start thinking of the protections
that LGBTQ couples have. As my youngest brother’s girlfriend said, “If anything
happens to him, the hospital isn’t going to let me do anything as his girlfriend.
It’s a different story if I am his wife.” In a heterosexual relationship, a
wife is legally allowed to take care of a husband should anything happen to him
and visa-versa. By refusing to grant legal recognition to LGBTQ relationships,
you actually deny an individual the right to be cared for by the person who is
likely to know them best.
I go back to the example of my sister. When she first
came out and told me, I was a little taken back. However, she was still the
same person after she told as she was before she told me. Nothing changed
because of her admission. She remains the sister I grew up loving.
Once the proverbial cat was out of the bag, she seemed
happier. From what little I got to see of her relationships, it seemed that she
was happier in her “girl-girl” relationships than in her “boy-girl” relationships.
She was initially a bit apprehensive about coming out to my mother but everything
turned out cool.
My step-father, who grew up in the 1950s in the USA
(not exactly a LGBTQ-Friendly era), said it best at last night’s wedding. In his
speech he said, “I didn’t lose a daughter tonight. I gained one.”
I know that the argument is that it’s argued that
same-sex relationships are not “normal.” However, what defines normal? My
sister’s marriage to another woman involved letting families know. It planning
an event and by extension a life together. She wanted everybody to know.
My first marriage, which was a “normal” heterosexual
marriage between a man and a woman wasn’t like that. I literally shuddered at
the idea of planning a life together and I made it clear that I didn’t want my
family to know that I was getting legally bound to her. I acknowledged to her
that whilst I would try and make it work with her, I didn’t see my life with
her as being filled with happiness.
So, what’s normal here? You could say that my sister’s
marriage is not normal because it was with someone with the “wrong” gender. You
could say mine was with someone of the “right” gender. However, if you leave
that aside, my sister actually got it right. Her marriage made everyone in the
family happy because she was happy. As my step-dad said, he gained a daughter
and I gained a sister. In my first marriage, I actually risked losing my family.
My mother actually made me promise I’d get out of the marriage if I was unhappy
and the family celebrated the day, I took out a Protection Order against her
and when she actually saw the light and divorced me.
We are often obsessed with the wrong things. In marriage we get obsessed with gender, social status and prospects. We don’t think enough about the things that count like love. If there’s anything that made my trip worthwhile is the fact that my sister’s wedding showed me that love wins and I managed to gain an entire family in the process.
No comments
Post a Comment