I have just had
the most unproductive of days. Was tasked to que up at DBS Marina Bay Financial
Centre Branch. The objective was to get a banker’s guarantee form signed and
handed over to the bank. The experience started at 11am. As a matter of full disclosure,
DBS is the bank I operate out of.
The mission, in
military speak was a total failure because, well, the customer was still waiting
for service as the bank was closing. To be fair to the bank, they continued to
serve customers even after official closing hours. You could say that at least
the bank was behaving like a restaurant that holds its doors open for that
customer that continues to sit there well beyond last order.
However, unlike
restaurants, this is a bank where people were obliged to sit there and wait. No
one came round to offer refreshments and what became very clear that whilst the
staff on the floor were grossly overworked, they were also underpowered to
their jobs. You could count the number of times an individual had to run to the
backroom to check things. I went to see a manager about an issue, which she
then tried to pass onto another staff who was dealing with an irate customer
who had been waiting for an hour and a half. When I finally managed to see a
member of staff who could answer my questions, she proceeded to run into the
backroom for 20 over minutes.
Again, I
understand that banking can be a bureaucratic process and when it comes to
compliance, one should be careful. However, why does the person facing the
customer need to run to a backroom to check on things for every single enquiry?
If you calculate the time it took for the front stuff to rush to the backroom
and back, you will probably find that it would probably add up to around 12
hours or more.
In fairness to
DBS, the place was crowded. It was as if people felt that in the post lockdown
world, people were releasing their pent-up frustration of not being able to see
their bankers.
Around a month
ago, I had to visit the OCBC Main Branch on Chulia Street to buy a banker’s draft
for a client. As a matter of full disclosure, OCBC is the bank that holds my mortgage.
The place was
not what you would call crowded. So, the bank decided that it would follow
suite and a huge counter designed for 10 had only three manning the counter. Well,
I rephrase, it was actually two, the third person was a “supervisor” working
very hard looking over the shoulder of the other two.
In the meantime,
the rest of the customer service staff were very busy looking at each other,
probably discussing the results of lunch. Which was far more than what I had because
I was prancing around from 11.45 all the way to 15.30. It took nearly found
hours for a 10-minute transaction.
You know, I get
that things may not be as efficient as we may like them to be. I do get that
sometimes there is give and take. But seriously, why must customers wait for
corporates to take their own sweet time to do simple things. There is no reason
for banks to be short staffed (You tell me a construction site cannot hire
locals I can understand – but a bank?). We have so many technologies to make
things so much easier. I think of a former client who has a product that can
analyse bank statements in a matter of seconds and another product that automatesmaking entries into accounting ledgers. Sure, I get that its good to have old
fashioned skills but why insist on doing things by hand when a machine can do it
faster and dare, I say better.
Processes need
to be redesigned around the customer. I think of Seafirst bank (Now Bank of
America), which was so cock sure of its service that it offers five dollars for
anyone who had to wait more than five minutes, and this was in the early
nineties when you laughed at people with mobile phones for being pretentious
and the internet was only a Geeks wet dream.
Why can’t our
local banks that are trying to be “world-class” and Singapore trying to be a “financial
hub” take leaf from a bank in Washington State and challenges themselves in
making life better for the people they are taking money from.
1 comment
Fully agreed with you.. no reason why they banks cannot be fully staffed.. this is critical as the population ages and elderly need some face to face interaction
Post a Comment