The
Prime Minister has just finished his National Day Rally speech for
the year and everyone is busy chatting about his speech. The
mainstream media published the uplifting bits of his speech, while
the online chaps did their song and dance about being more 'liberal'
in his approach to government.
One
of the things that caught my eye was the fact that he spent a good
portion of his speech telling Singaporeans how to behave better. This
portion of the speech was devoted to dealing with ugly online
behaviour towards our new arrivals from elsewhere and the thrust of
his comments was that such bad behaviour ruined Singapore's
international reputation.
For
the record, I agree with what he said. Perhaps it's just me but the
attitudes towards foreigners, particularly those who happen to be
dark skinned and from other parts of Asia disgusts me. I feel like
vomiting whenever I hear highly educated professional people in
Singapore talk about the unfortunate darkies doing the 'dirty' jobs.
I
don't know what it is about our society? For some reason, those who
have been blessed cannot help but start treating the less fortunate
as something worse than dirt. The disease isn't just restricted to
native born folk. Perfectly nice people from elsewhere end up getting
infected too. Read a comment in the Today paper from some White
Australian expat about how clearing up our trays in a fast food
joints would be a denial of jobs for old people. Not sure how he
worked that one out – he must have been thinking, “Granny, I'm
doing you a favour by letting you clean up my shit.”
The
nation is unfortunately filled with scum and nobody seems terribly
interested in dealing with this type of behaviour. So, it's a relief
that somebody as prominent as the Prime Minister has called attention
to rotten behaviour that seems to be accepted as normal by the
general public.
However,
if one has to think of things in their proper context, one has to ask
whether it's a failure of leadership that we have to tell a 47-year
old nation how to behave and to have some decent manners.
Singapore
has been an independent state for 47-years. In those years of
independence we've become a serious model for the rest of the world
to follow in terms of development. As I've said on so many occasions,
our little Red Dot has become so advanced that it's not just people
from the less developed world who are trying to prolong their stay
here – even Americans, Brits and other Europeans are trying to hang
onto the life that Singapore offers them. We are what every city
should be – clean, green and rich.
Unfortunately
our behaviour or at least our growth as people seems to have stayed
in the dark ages, while our GDP has shot into the stratosphere. It's
a sad reflection on our nation when the Prime Minister has to tell us
how to behave after 47-years of independence.
What's
happened? Well, unfortunately, while I agree with what the Prime
Minister said, I believe that the government has to bear a good deal
of the responsibility for the current situation. Much of what happens
in Singapore starts with government policy.
Lets
start with the obvious. Government's generally don't deal with
personal behaviour issues unless they turn into issues that affect
public peace. In the early days of Singapore's development, the key
was economic development. It was right to do this in the sense that
the Singapore Government actually found the money to finance many of
the things that have made Singapore a very livable city.
However,
the government has to be responsible for creating a culture where
certain people are treated as elite Demi-Gods while certain others
are treated as something worse than the shit you scrape off the
bottom of your shoes.
Let's
start with the fact that Singaporeans children are streamed off into
different academic streams at an early age. While I don't disagree
with streaming, the way it's executed in Singapore meant that those
who didn't make it into the more academic streams ended up being
labeled as “stupid” and destined for jobs that would not pay
terribly well.
Then,
let's look at wages for the white and blue collar. Those in white
collar professions pay more than their blue collar counterparts. The
difference is so much more that the Middle Class end up telling their
children that not being academically gifted means you'll end up in a
badly paid blue collar job.
So,
right from the very beginning, a child is told that unless you're
from a certain academic background, you are somehow less than human.
You are, in effect, sub-human if you are anything less than an
“A-level” student, for example. I remember being in the army and
being told, “But you're MUCH smarter than the men.” I was an
“A-Level” student while the men were not. I was supposed to be
part of a 'smart' elite telling the mules what to do. Thankfully, I
never saw myself as being smarter than the men and unfortunately that
thinking still persist in the corridors of power.
It
doesn't help that this thinking applies to foreign policy and
immigration. Those from the 'desired' countries are encouraged to
migrate with large salaries and encouraged to wall themselves in
swanky homes paid for by big companies. It's drummed into the heads
of school children that people from the less fortunate countries are
a cause of social problems.
So,
yes, I agree - Singaporeans need to learn how to behave. It's sad
that we have to be told to behave after 47-years but we got to start
somewhere. However, the government should also look at the cause of
why we are the way we are and start tackling the problem with some
urgency.
No comments
Post a Comment