I’ve decided
that it’s time I need a bit of intellectual stimulation and so I returned to my
academic roots and decided to pick up a copy of Zealot, The Life and Times of
Jesus of Nazareth. The book is written by Reza Azlan, scholar of religious
studies and professor of creative writing at University of California,
Riverside.
The professor’s
argument is simple – when we look at the life and times of Jesus or at least
the Jesus of history (the man who lived) in the context of his times. When you
look at him in the context of his time rather as a spokesman of a “religious”
message, the picture of who Jesus was becomes rather interesting. The professor
argues that Jesus was not the “pacifist” who came to unite the world in a
peaceful, loving embrace. He was, if you look at him in the context of his
time, a radical and revolutionary who hopped to overthrow the established order
of the day.
Jesus, as
Professor Aslan notes, lived in a time of great social inequality. Jesus was a
rough and barely literate peasant who lived in a society where people like him
existed to serve the powers that be – which in this case was the Jewish
Priesthood and the Roman Empire, which supported them. There was, in his day,
extreme poverty for the masses and the “chosen” few lived a life of luxury at
the expense of the masses.
When you look
at Jesus in this context, everything Jesus said was a dangerous and political
message to the established order of the day. Professor Aslan argues that
Christian messages like “the meek shall inherit the earth,” were powerful
political messages to those who held power – it was a warning that God would
make the poor and weak into the strong and blessed, whereas those in power (the
strong and rich) were about to get their comeuppance by God. If you were to
bring this argument into the modern context, Jesus was a revolutionary figure
akin to the great Communist leaders like Mao or Lenin.
When you look
at this argument, you got to start thinking – would Jesus, the revolutionary described
by Reza Aslan, exist in the modern world.
I think of the
little City State where I’ve lived for the past decade – Singapore. This little
city state has become a beacon of modern success. We are consistently nominated
as the best place on the planet to do business. Everyone who moves to Singapore
praises the country as the ideal place to make vast amounts of money.
While that’s
true, I can’t help but notice that our society is developing many of the things
that Professor Aslan described in Jesus’s day. We are, for a start, becoming an
exceedingly unequal society. If one looks at the Gini co-efficient, it leads to
the view that wealth in Singapore is concentrated in very few hands. We have
the world’s highest paid ministers and we are increasingly becoming the preferred
home for the world’s billionaires. However, if one walks the streets of Singapore,
one cannot escape the fact that there are people who are sleeping on the
streets and people who barely have enough to eat.
In Jesus’s day,
the centre of life revolved around a rather opulent temple, which was run by a
select and wealthy group of priest. Back then, there was only one religion. In
Singapore we have a growing number of opulent religious buildings. Ironically,
many of them are run by churches, headed by charismatic leaders who claim to
have a special relationship with God.
Religion is
business. Interestingly enough, this was also the case when Jesus walked the
earth.
Professor Aslan points out that it wasn’t uncommon for people to make a
career as exorcist, healers and men of God. He argues that what made Jesus
different from the rest was the fact that he provided services (healing etc)
free of charge. Interestingly enough, if one looks at the way “religious
enterprises” work, you’ll find that they charge for certain services – one only
has to look at the fund raising powers of the likes of the New Creation Church
(S$21 million in 24 hours).
Our modern
society is seeing the conditions that existed in Jesus’s day. So, the question
is, would Jesus gain the traction that he did, had he been around today?
I worry that
the answer, especially in Asian societies is no. Somehow, the concept of
gathering as much for yourself as possible has become psychologically ingrained
in us as being part of “success through merit.”
Furthermore, if
one looks at Singapore as an example, the powers that be have given the general
population such a stake in society that few would entertain the idea of
overthrowing the established order.
Ironically, the
churches like New Creation and City Harvest thrive on this. Jesus’s message has
been repackaged as a means to find salvation in the current social order rather
than a means of bringing about a new social order. I remember the Pretend
Girlfriend with No Benefits bringing me to one of New Creation’s sermons. The
Pastor spent a good amount of time talking about how prayer would lead to
prosperity rather than a redistribution of it.
To be fair, to
the Churches, Eastern Religions can’t escape the idea of prayer for prosperity.
Huong, my better half, tells me in moments of affection that she’ll pray for my
business prosperity.
I’m older now
and I guess I’m less inclined to think that the only purpose of the established
order is to be fought. However, I worry that we are becoming increasingly
focused on preserving the status quo and our role in it that we have lost focus
on the fact that God might have wanted us to disrupt it and make it better for
us.
No comments
Post a Comment